• Profile
Close

An approach to identify a minimum and rational proportion of caesarean sections in resource-poor settings: A global network study

The Lancet Global Health Jul 25, 2018

Belizán JM, et al. - Considering the lack of establishment of the specific prevalence of obstetric and medical complications that require caesarean section, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), researchers performed a literature review providing information to inform the approach to the provision of caesarean section in low-resource settings. The site with a high caesarean section prevalence revealed that more than half of the procedures were not performed for life-saving conditions. However, an insufficient number of caesarean procedures to cover those life-threatening causes was observed among the sites with low proportions of caesarean section (below 9%). They recommend concurrently focusing on the life-threatening causes for the mother and child while attempting to establish a minimum caesarean prevalence.

Methods

  • The prevalence of obstetric and medical conditions for six potentially life-saving indications for which caesarean section could reduce mortality in LMICs was established via performing a literature review.
  • A large, prospective population-based dataset from six LMICs (Argentina, Guatemala, Kenya, India, Pakistan, and Zambia) was then analysed in order to determine the prevalence of caesarean section by indication for each site.
  • For this study, an acceptable number of events were considered between the 25th and 75th percentile of those found in the literature.

Results

  • A total of 271,855 deliveries in six LMICs (seven research sites) were enrolled between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2013.
  • Findings revealed that prevalence of caesarean section ranged from 35% (3467 of 9813 deliveries in Argentina) to 1% (303 of 16,764 deliveries in Zambia).
  • For five of six indications, Argentina's and Guatemala's sites all met the minimum 25th percentile.
  • However, the minimum prevalence for caesarean section for any of the indications was not reached at sites in Zambia and Kenya.
  • A minimum overall caesarean section of 9% across all sites was required to meet the prevalence of the six indications in the population studied.

Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay