• Profile
Close

Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected vs clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: A randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial

The Lancet Oncology Jan 20, 2019

Polman NJ, et al. - In this randomized, non-inferiority trial, researchers assessed the clinical accuracy of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples within an organized screening setting. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) were primary endpoints. Investigators observed that HPV tests performed with a clinically validated PCR-based test had similar accuracy in the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions in self-collected and clinically-collected samples. According to findings, HPV self-sampling could be used in routine screening as a primary screening method.

Methods

  • Women between the ages of 29 and 61 were invited to take part in the study.
  • Women who gave informed consent were randomly assigned (1:1, with a block size of ten stratified by age) to either a self-sampling group, in which women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV, Oss, Netherlands) or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general medical practitioner with a Cervex-Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV).
  • Using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay (Labo Biomedical Products BV, Rijswijk, Netherlands), all samples were tested for HPV.
  • In accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines, HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology.
  • Detection of CIN of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) were primary endpoints.
  • Non-inferiority of HPV testing on self-collected vs clinician-collected samples was assessed against a margin of 90% for the relative sensitivity and 98% for the relative specificity.

Results

  • Of the 187,473 women invited, 8,212 were allocated randomly to the self-sampling group and 8,198 to the clinician-based sampling group.
  • After excluding women who met or did not return their sample, 7,643 women were included in the self-sampling group and 6,282 in the clinician-based sampling group.
  • Findings revealed that 569 (7.4%) self-collected samples and 451 (7.2%) clinician-collected samples tested positive for HPV (relative risk 1.04 [95% CI 0.92–1.17]).
  • It was noted that median follow-up duration for HPV-positive women was 20 months (IQR 17–22).
  • They observed that the CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not vary between self-sampling and clinician-based sampling (relative sensitivity 0.96 [0.90–1.03]; relative specificity 1.00 [0.99–1.01]).
  • Relative sensitivity was 0.99 (0.91–1.08) and relative specificity was 1.00 (0.99–1.01) for the CIN3+ endpoint.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay