• Profile
Close

Effect of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem on 30-day mortality for patients with E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance: A randomized clinical trial

JAMA Sep 15, 2018

Harris PNA, et al. - Researchers investigated the efficacy of definitive therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem (a carbapenem) in patients with bloodstream infection caused by ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae to assess whether piperacillin-tazobactam can be used as carbapenem-sparing therapy in these patients. Outcomes suggested non-inferiority of definitive treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem regarding 30-day mortality. Thus, the findings do not support use of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem in this setting.

Methods

  • Hospitalized patients enrolled from February 2014 to July 2017 were included in this noninferiority, parallel group, multicenter (sites, 26; countries, 9), randomized clinical trial.
  • Adult patients having ≥ 1 positive blood culture with E. coli or Klebsiella spp testing nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam were eligible for inclusion.
  • Researchers screened 1,646 patients; of these, they included 391 in the study.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, every 6 hours (n = 188 participants) or meropenem, 1 g, every 8 hours (n = 191 participants) for a minimum of 4 days, up to a maximum of 14 days; the total duration was determined by the treating clinician.
  • All-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization was assessed as the primary outcome.
  • They used a noninferiority margin of 5%.

Results

  • The primary outcome was assessed in 378 (99.7%) patients who completed the trial among 379 patients (mean age, 66.5 years; 47.8% were women); they were randomized to receive ≥1 dose of study drug and were included in the primary analysis population.
  • The primary outcome of mortality at 30 days was met by 23 of 187 patients (12.3%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam vs 7 of 191 (3.7%) who were randomized to meropenem (risk difference, 8.6% [1-sided 97.5% confidence interval: −∞ to 14.5%]; P=0.90 for noninferiority).
  • In an analysis of the per-protocol population, consistent effects were evident.
  • Nonfatal serious adverse events were recorded in 5 of 188 patients (2.7%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 3 of 191 (1.6%) in the meropenem group.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay