• Profile
Close

Real-world outcomes for neoadjuvant capecitabine vs infusional 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

Internal Medicine Journal Aug 27, 2021

Loft M, Wong HL, Kosmider S, et al. - A lower rate of pathological complete response (pCR) was offered by capecitabine vs infusional 5-FU in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a difference not explained by assessed patient or tumour features. A likely explanation is poor treatment compliance with oral therapy in the real-world setting. Capecitabine is now the predominantly employed neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC.

  • Required data were collected from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database at three Australian hospitals.

  • 657 patients with LARC were analyzed, 498 undergoing infusional 5-FU and 159 receiving capecitabine.

  • Post-approval, marked increase in capecitabine use has been noted, now being used in more than 80% of patients.

  • In capecitabine-treated patients and in those who received 5-FU, pCR was achieved in 22/159 (13.8%) and in 118/380 (23.7%) patients, respectively.

  • Postoperative oxaliplatin was needed in more capecitabine-treated patients.

  • Similar 2-year progression-free survival was reported.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay