• Profile
Close

Minimally invasive management vs open surgery in the treatment of penetrating bladder injuries: A retrospective cohort study

BMC Urology Oct 02, 2021

Culhane J, et al. - Researchers compared patients with penetrating bladder injury who received minimally invasive management vs those receiving traditional open surgical treatment with respect to their outcomes.

  • Retrospective cohort study of 18,506 trauma patients treated from 2012 through 2019 at researchers’ trauma center, and data of 1,961,104 patients from the National Trauma Data Bank for the years 2016 and 2017.

  • In the local group, a bladder injury was recorded in 117 (0.63%) patients; 30 of these (25.6%) were penetrating.

  • In the National Trauma Data Bank group, bladder injury was recorded in 5,330 patients (0.27%); 963 of these (19.5%) were penetrating.

  • Open surgery is required to manage most of the penetrating bladder injury, however, minimally invasive management can be safely performed in a small proportion of patients.

  • In select patients, lower total complications and shorter hospital length of stay were observed in correlation with receiving minimally invasive management.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay