• Profile
Close

Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: A comparative study

Urolithiasis Mar 21, 2018

ElSheemy MS, et al. - Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PNL) was compared with standard-PNL for the treatment of renal stones. With markedly reduced complications and hospital stay, mini-PNL vs standard-PNL had significantly lower but clinically comparable stone free rate (SFR). Furthermore, most of the cases could be performed tubeless. With multiple stones or large stone burden (>2 cm2), there was a significant difference in SFR, which was not found with single stones or stone burden ≤2 cm2.

Methods
  • Between March 2010 and May 2013, a retrospective study was carried out for patients treated by Mini-PNL or standard-PNL via 18 and 30 Fr tracts, respectively, using pneumatic lithotripsy.
  • For Mini-PNL and for standard-PNL, semirigid ureteroscope (8.5/11.5 Fr) and 24 Fr nephroscope was used, respectively.
  • In addition to logistic regression analysis, Student-t, Mann–Whitney, Chi square or Fisher’s exact tests were performed as appropriate, to compare both groups in stone free rate(SFR), complications and operative time.
  • P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results
  • Researchers found that mini-PNL (378) and standard-PNL (151) were nearly comparable in patients and stones criteria including stone burden (3.77 ± 2.21 vs 3.77 ± 2.43 cm2; respectively).
  • They also noted that there was no significant difference in number of tracts or supracostal puncture.
  • Longer operative time (68.6 ± 29.09 vs 60.49 ± 11.38 min; p=0.434), significantly shorter hospital stay (2.43 ± 1.46 vs 4.29 ± 1.28 days) and significantly higher rate of tubeless PNL (75.1 vs 4.6%) were reported for mini-PNL.
  • In standard-PNL, significantly higher complications were noted (7.9 vs 20.5%; p < 0.001).
  • Notably, significantly lower SFR was obtained with Mini-PNL (89.9 vs 96%; p=0.022).
  • Researchers observed that this significant difference was present with multiple stones and large stone burden (> 2 cm2), but the SFR was comparable between both groups with single stone or stone burden ≤ 2 cm.
  • On logistic regression, it was confirmed that standard-PNL carried significantly higher complications and SFR but significantly shorter operative time.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay