• Profile
Close

Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? A randomized prospective study

World Journal of Urology Feb 19, 2018

Farouk A, et al. - This study entailed the assessment and comparison of the outcomes of the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for the treatment for renal stones in the pediatric population. It was determined that mini-PCNL was a safe procedure according to Clavien grade of complications. Following 3 sessions of ESWL, a similar stone-free rate with a lower retreatment rate was exhibited by the mini-PCNL. Nonetheless, the mini-PCNL presented with more radiation exposure and warranted a longer hospital stay

Methods

  • Eligible candidates included 108 patients younger than 12 years of age with 1-2 cm single renal stone (pelvic or calyceal).
  • They were randomly allocated into 2 groups, each containing 54 patients.
  • Using 16.5 Fr percutaneous sheath, individuals in group A were subjected to mini-PCNL.
  • On the other hand, patients in group B underwent ESWL using Dornier Compact Sigma.

Results

  • As per the results, the stone-free rate (SFR) after first session was 88.9% (48 cases) and 55.6% (30 cases) for groups A and B, respectively.
  • Findings exhibited a highly, statistically marked difference P= 0.006.
  • It was determined that 2 patients (3.7%) in group A needed second session of PCNL, while 18 subjects (33.3%) in group B needed a second session, of theses 18 patients six patients needed a third session of ESWL.
  • Following the third session of ESWL and second look PCNL, it was noted that the stone-free rates were 92.59% (50 cases) and 88.89% (48 cases) for groups A and B, respectively, (P=0.639), which appeared to be statistically insignificant.
  • A considerably longer mean hospital stay and fluoroscopy exposure were demonstrated in the mini-PCNL group.
  • It was inferred that the complication rate in groups A and group B were (22.2%) and (14.8%), respectively, which was statistically insignificant (P=0.484).

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay