• Profile
Close

Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block vs particulate bone substitutes: 6 month-results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

Clinical Oral Implants Research Jul 26, 2019

Benic GI, et al. - Researchers tested in this investigation whether block bone substitute used for guided bone regeneration (GBR) of peri-implant defects leads to different thicknesses of the augmented hard tissue compared to particulate bone substitute. In 24 subjects, 24 two-piece dental implants were placed >4 months following tooth extraction. After 6 months of healing, block bone substitute used for GBR of peri-implant defects was superior to particulate bone substitute regarding the dimension of the augmented hard tissue.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay