• Profile
Close

Feasibility, safety and outcome of inguinal hernia repair under spinal vs general anesthesia in preterm and term infants

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Oct 11, 2020

Ceccanti S, Cervellone A, Pesce MV, et al. - Via this 6-year, single center, non-randomized interventional study (2013-2019), researchers sought to compare surgical outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair (IHR) performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) vs general anesthesia (GA) in neonates and infants. In addition, they identified criteria to prognosticate the success or failure of SA. SA and GA were used in 68 infants (78 IHR) and 37 infants (44 IHR) at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, respectively. Outcomes of this pilot study confirm the safety and effectiveness of SA with no detrimental effect on surgical outcome of neonates and infants undergoing IHR. In addition, it may aid in further defining the patients that may have a successful SA. Per researchers experience, SA is particularly suitable in infants weighing < 4000 g, and conversion to GA associates with prolonged operative time.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay