• Profile
Close

Effectiveness evaluation of two volumizing hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in a controlled, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Aug 16, 2017

Kerscher M, et al. – This paper coveted a comparison of the safety and effectiveness of Cohesive Polydensified Matrix 26 mg/mL hyaluronic acid (HA) gel (CPM–26) and Vycross 20 mg/ml HA gel (VYC–20). CPM–26 was reported to be non–inferior to VYC–20 based on Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) ratings at M3. It brought to light a favorable safety and effectiveness profile for midfacial volume enhancement, with results lasting up to M18.
Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay