• Profile
Close

Effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial

JAMA Dec 10, 2021

Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, et al. - Researchers investigated the necessity for intubation and time to clinical improvement among patients with severe COVID-19 in correlation with the use of high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula, vs conventional oxygen therapy.

  • A randomized clinical trial including 220 patients with severe COVID-19.

  • Those treated with high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula vs with conventional oxygen therapy had intubation and mechanical ventilation rate of 34.3% vs 51.0%, respectively.

  • The median time to clinical recovery was 11 days vs 14 days.

  • Findings suggest reduced likelihood of invasive mechanical ventilation and decreased time to clinical recovery among patients with severe COVID-19 in correlation with receiving treatment with high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay