• Profile
Close

Does a combination of ≥ 2 abnormal tests vs the ERC-ESICM stepwise algorithm improve prediction of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest? A post-hoc analysis of the ProNeCA multicentre study

Resuscitation Dec 19, 2020

Scarpino M, Lolli F, Lanzo G, et al. - In this post-hoc analysis of ProNeCA multicentre prognostication study, experts explored whether testing accuracy for poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest was improved when combining pupillary light reflexes (PLR)/short-latency evoked potentials (SSEPs) with malignant electroencephalogram (EEG), edema on brain computed tomography (CT), or early status myoclonus (SM). The prognostic accuracy of the ERC-ESICM prognostication strategy was compared with one that combined ≥ 2 abnormal outcomes from any of PLR, SSEPs, EEG, CT and SM. There were 210 adult comatose resuscitated patients examined, of whom 164 (78%) had poor neurological outcome (CPC 3–5) at six months. A prognostication strategy combining ≥ 2 among PLR, SSEPs, EEG, CT and SM in comatose resuscitated patients was more specific than the 2015 ERC-ESICM prognostication algorithm for anticipating the 6-month poor neurological outcome.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay