• Profile
Close

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis with respect to responsiveness to biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs: A retrospective cohort study from the FIRST registry

Clinical &Experimental Rheumatology Online Feb 01, 2022

Full Papers

 

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis with respect to responsiveness to biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs: a retrospective cohort study from the FIRST registry


1, 2, 3, 4

 

Author information

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, and The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
  2. Department of Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
  4. The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan. tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp

CER13899
2022 Vol.40, N°1
PI 0086, PF 0096
Full Papers

purchase article

PMID: 33635223 [PubMed]

Received: 06/08/2020
Accepted : 25/01/2021
In Press: 15/02/2021
Published: 28/01/2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (dt-RA) is an emerging concept defined as persistency of signs and/or symptoms despite prior treatment. However, whether this refractoriness affects effectiveness and tolerance to next treatment is not fully understood. This study aimed to find cut-off values for a definition of dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to newly used biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).
METHODS:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the FIRST registry. An inadequate response to current b/tsDMARDs was defined as clinical disease activity index >10 at week 22 or termination of treatment within 22 weeks due to insufficient efficacy. Cut-off values were defined according to the number of past failures to DMARDs and current dose of glucocorticoid. Responsiveness to newly used b/tsDMARDs were compared with respect to above versus below cut-off values.
RESULTS:
Failures to ≥2 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and ≥4 b/tsDMARDs as well as ≥3mg/day of glucocorticoid were independent cut-off values associated with poor responsiveness to newly used b/tsDMARD treatment. Concomitant use of glucocorticoid was significantly correlated with an increased hazard of infection. Failures to ≥2 csDMARDs was associated with less improvement in inflammatory symptoms, while that to ≥4 b/tsDMARDs was associated with less improvement in health assessment questionnaire and global health as well.
CONCLUSIONS:
We propose cut-off values of ≥2 failures to csDMARDs and/or ≥4 b/tsDMARDs as a definition of dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to use of b/tsDMARDs.

Rheumatology Article

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay