• Profile
Close

Comparing the efficacy of articulating spacer constructs for knee periprosthetic joint infection eradication: All-cement vs. real-component spacers

Journal of Arthroplasty Jan 26, 2021

Roof MA, Baylor JL, Bernstein J, et al. - In this study, the real-component was compared with all-cement articulating spacers for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment. Between April 2011-August 2020, researchers performed a retrospective observational study to analyze the arthroplasty database at three academic hospitals for articulating spacers placed for TKA PJIs. Individuals were classified as receiving a real-component or an all-cement articulating spacer. Data on demographics, surgical information, and outcomes were collected. They distinguished 164 spacers: 72 all-cement and 92 real-component. This study’s findings demonstrate that real-component spacers had improved ROM after stage 1 and lower blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay after stage 2 compared to all-cement articulating spacers. In ROM, the two spacer constructs had the same ultimate change and no variation in reinfection rates, highlighting that both articulating spacer types may be safe and effective options for two-stage revision TKA.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay