Kannan NB, et al. - Experts compared the anatomical and visual outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) peeling vis-a-vis inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) flap for the treatment of idiopathic large Full-Thickness Macular Holes (FTMH). They randomized the patients into Group A (ILM peeling) and Group B (inverted ILM flap). Findings suggested a statistical similarity of the anatomical and functional outcome of inverted ILM flap technique in large FTMH to that seen in conventional ILM peeling. In groups A and B, the mean improvement in BCVA was 1.4 lines and 2.1 lines, respectively.