• Profile
Close

Biliary-enteric drainage vs primary liver transplant as initial treatment for children with biliary atresia

JAMA Surgery Sep 20, 2018

LeeVan E, et al. - Infants with biliary atresia initially treated with biliary-enteric drainage (BED) were compared with infants who underwent primary liver transplant (pLT) in terms of their survival. Outcomes of this cohort study including 626 infants with biliary atresia showed a markedly reduced risk of long-term mortality among patients who underwent pLT vs patients initially managed with BED procedure.

Methods

  • Using deidentified records from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database, researchers performed a cohort study of patients with biliary atresia (n=1,252) between January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2015.
  • They categorized patients into 1 of 2 cohorts: those who received BED treatment and those who underwent pLT.
  • Those born before January 1, 1995 and those without any documented operative intervention by 5 years of age were excluded.
  • From January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2015, they performed data analysis.
  • The BED and pLT cohorts were compared regarding overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method.
  • By comparing survival before 2002 and on or after January 1, 2002, the investigators examined the treatment’s association with treatment era.

Results

  • Of the 1,252 patients with biliary atresia who were identified, 626 remained following exclusion; 351 (56.1%) were female and 275 (43.9%) were male with a median (interquartile range) age at intervention for initial BED treatment of 65 (48-81) days.
  • Among the 626 patients studied, 313 patients (50.0%) were treated with initial BED treatment, and 313 patients (50.0%) underwent pLT.
  • Despite a higher mortality rate within the first 3 months after the procedure, patients who underwent pLT showed a reduced risk of long-term mortality compared with patients initially managed with BED treatment (hazard ratio [HR] ≥6 months after the initial procedure: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08-0.42; P=0.01).
  • A substantially higher risk of mortality was evident for patients requiring salvage liver transplant than patients who received pLT (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25-0.76; P=0.003).
  • Patients who underwent pLT demonstrated better survival than those receiving BED treatment on or after 2002 (HR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.54; P < 0 .001), and this persisted when censoring patients who underwent salvage liver transplant (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.82; P=0.01).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay