Assessing accuracy of casting and additive manufacturing techniques for fabrication of a complete palatal coverage metal framework
Journal of Prosthodontics May 26, 2019
Forrester K, et al. - The accuracy of additive manufacturing vs conventional casting, specifically for fabrication of complete palatal coverage metal frameworks was reported. Three additive manufacturing techniques were tested: selective laser melting (SLM), electron beam melting (EBM), and computer-aided design/cast (CADcast), with conventional casting as the control. Findings revealed that the materials had significant differences in accuracy. Compared to the conventional technique, CADcast and SLM techniques were as or more accurate for producing an uncomplicated framework design.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries