• Profile
Close

A prospective, blinded, multicenter clinical trial to compare the efficacy, accuracy, and safety of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and surgical diagnostic arthroscopy

Arthroscopy May 31, 2018

Gill TJ, et al. - Authors compared the effectiveness, accuracy, and safety of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical diagnostic arthroscopy. With regard to the diagnosis of intra-articular, nonligamentous knee joint pathology, needle-based diagnostic imaging that could be used in the office setting was statistically equivalent to surgical diagnostic arthroscopy. Compared to MRI, a more detailed and accurate diagnostic assessment of intra-articular knee pathology could be provided with in-office diagnostic imaging. A safe, accurate, real-time, minimally invasive diagnostic modality was provided with the in-office diagnostic imaging to evaluate intra-articular pathology without the need for surgical diagnostic arthroscopy or high-cost imaging.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay