• Profile
Close

A 32-week randomized comparison of stepwise insulin intensification of biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30) vs basal–bolus therapy in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Therapy Nov 16, 2017

Linjawi S, et al. - The researchers compared the efficacy and safety of stepwise insulin intensification with biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) relative to stepwise intensification with a basal–bolus regimen of insulin glargine (IGlar) and insulin aspart (IAsp) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In glycemic control, insulin intensification with BIAsp 30 and basal–bolus demonstrated an improvement. Compared to basal–bolus, the change in HbA1c was statistically significantly lower for BIAsp 30. A numerically greater rate of overall severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed hypoglycemia and a statistically significantly higher rate of severe or BG-confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia was observed with basal–bolus compared with BIAsp 30.

Methods

  • The researchers randomized adults with T2D into 1 of 2 treatment arms for 32 weeks:
    • BIAsp 30 once daily (OD), with the possibility of stepwise treatment intensification up to BIAsp 30 three times daily (TID);
    • Insulin glargine OD, with the possibility of stepwise treatment intensification with insulin aspart up to TID.
  • Change from baseline in HbA1c after 32 weeks was the primary endpoint.

Results

  • The estimated mean change in HbA1c from baseline was statistically significantly lower in the BIAsp 30 arm (- 1.18%) vs basal-bolus (- 1.36%) [estimated treatment difference 0.18%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.01; 0.36; p < 0.05] after 32 weeks.
  • With BIAsp 30 (42.9%), the proportion of patients with HbA1c below 7.0% was statistically significantly lower compared with basal-bolus (56.9%) (odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.37; 0.89; p=0.01).
  • For BIAsp 30, the overall rate of severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed hypoglycemic events was numerically lower compared with basal–bolus.
  • The researchers observed a statistically significantly lower rate in nocturnal severe or BG-confirmed hypoglycemia in the BIAsp 30 arm relative to basal-bolus: estimated rate ratio 0.32 (95% CI 0.13; 0.79), p=0.0131.
  • In both treatment arms, the proportion of patients with adverse events was similar.

Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay