• Profile
Close

Comparative safety of dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment started during pregnancy in botswana: An observational study

The Lancet Global Health Jun 24, 2018

Zash R, et al. - Authors compared birth outcomes of women initiating dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with those of women initiating efavirenz-based ART in pregnancy in Botswana. Similar adverse birth outcomes were seen among pregnant women who initiated dolutegravir-based and efavirenz-based ART. Findings suggested a probability of safe initiation of dolutegravir-based ART in pregnancy.

Methods

  • Experts, in this observational study captured birth outcome data at eight government hospitals throughout Botswana (~45% of all deliveries in the country) in an ongoing study that started on August 15, 2014.
  • In this trial, they included women starting either efavirenz-based ART or dolutegravir-based ART during singleton pregnancy (regimen started and delivery occurring between August 15, 2014, and August 15, 2016 for efavirenz-based ART and between November 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017 for dolutegravir-based ART).
  • Births to mothers who had switched regimen or stopped ART were excluded.
  • The combined endpoints of any adverse outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth [< 37 weeks' gestation], small for gestational age [SGA; less than the tenth percentile of birthweight by gestational age], or neonatal death [within 28 days of age]) and severe adverse outcomes (stillbirth, neonatal death, very preterm birth [<32 weeks' gestation], and very SGA [less than the third percentile of birthweight by gestational age]) were the primary outcomes.
  • In order to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), they fitted log-binomial regression models, controlling for maternal age, gravidity, and education.

Results

  • As per data, this analysis included 1,729 pregnant women who initiated dolutegravir-based ART and 4,593 who initiated efavirenz-based ART.
  • Findings suggested that among women on dolutegravir vs efavirenz, the risk for any adverse birth outcome was similar (33·2% vs 35·0%; aRR 0·95, 95% CI 0·88-1·03), as was the risk of any severe birth outcome (10·7% vs 11·3%; 0·94, 0·81-1·11).
  • In the individual outcomes of stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, very preterm birth, SGA, or very SGA, no significant differences by regimen were noted.
Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay