• Profile
Close

Risk-adapted therapy for young children with medulloblastoma (SJYC07): Therapeutic and molecular outcomes from a multicentre, phase 2 trial

The Lancet Oncology May 24, 2018

Robinson GW, et al. - Researchers investigated event-free survival and molecular characteristics related to progression-free survival in young patients with medulloblastoma using a risk-stratified treatment strategy designed to defer, reduce, or delay radiation exposure. No improvement in event-free survival was brought about by the risk-adapted approach. In the methylation subgroup analyses, improved progression-free survival was found in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup vs the group 3 subgroup. Moreover, within the SHH subgroup, improved progression-free survival was seen in the iSHH-II subtype vs the iSHH-I subtype in the absence of radiation, intraventricular chemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy.

Methods

  • For this multicentre, phase 2 trial including children younger than 3 years with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma at six centres in the USA and Australia, children aged 3–5 years with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic medulloblastoma without any high-risk features were also eligible.
  • To be eligible, patients were required to start therapy within 31 days from definitive surgery, had a Lansky performance score of at least 30, and did not receive previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Using clinical and histological criteria, patients were stratified postoperatively into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk treatment groups.
  • Identical induction chemotherapy (methotrexate, vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide) was given to all patients, with high-risk patients also receiving an additional five doses of vinblastine.
  • Risk-adapted consolidation therapy was received following induction: cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2 on day 1), etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2), and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min on day 2) for two 4-week cycles was received by low-risk patients; focal radiation therapy (54 Gy with a clinical target volume of 5 mm over 6 weeks) to the tumour bed was received by intermediate-risk patients; and chemotherapy with targeted intravenous topotecan (area under the curve 120–160 ng-h/mL intravenously on days 1–5) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1–5) was received by high-risk patients.
  • Maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, topotecan, and erlotinib was administered to all patients following consolidation.
  • Event-free survival and patterns of methylation profiling associated with progression-free survival were considered as coprimary endpoints.
  • Outcome and safety analyses were per protocol (all patients who received at least one dose of induction chemotherapy); including all patients with tissue available for methylation profiling, biological analyses were carried out.

Results

  • Enrollment of 81 patients with histologically confirmed medulloblastoma was carried out between Nov 27, 2007, and April 19, 2017.
  • Following an interim analysis on Dec 2, 2015, accrual to the low-risk group was suspended when the 1-year event-free survival was estimated to be below the stopping rule boundary.
  • A median follow-up of 5·5 years (IQR 2·7–7·3) revealed 5-year event-free survival to be 31·3% (95% CI 19·3–43·3) for the whole cohort, 55·3% (95% CI 33·3–77·3) in the low-risk cohort (n=23) vs 24·6% (3·6–45·6) in the intermediate-risk cohort (n=32; hazard ratio 2·50, 95% CI 1·19–5·27; p=0·016) and 16·7% (3·4–30·0) in the high-risk cohort (n=26; 3·55, 1·66–7·59; p=0·0011; overall p=0·0021).
  • By methylation subgroup, the reported 5-year progression-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 34·6–67·6) in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup (n=42), 8·3% (95% CI 0·0–24·0%) in the group 3 subgroup (n=24), and 13·3% (95% CI 0·0–37·6%) in the group 4 subgroup (n=10).
  • Researchers identified iSHH-I and iSHH-II as two distinct methylation subtypes within the SHH subgroup.
  • For iSHH-I and for iSHH-II, the observed 5-year progression-free survival was 27·8% (95% CI 9·0–46·6; n=21) and 75·4% (55·0–95·8; n=21), respectively.
  • The adverse events that were most commonly reported were: grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia (48 patients [59%]), neutropenia (21 [26%]), infection with neutropenia (20 [25%]), leucopenia (15 [19%]), vomiting (15 [19%]), and anorexia (13 [16%]).
  • No occurrence of treatment-related deaths was reported.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay