• Profile

Partial gland ablation versus radical prostatectomy comparative analysis of partial gland ablation and radical prostatectomy to treat low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Oncologic and functional outcomes

The Journal of Urology Aug 29, 2017

Garcia–Barreras S, et al. – An analysis was designed to evaluate oncologic and functional outcomes of partial gland ablation (PGA) compared with robot–assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for patients with low–and intermediate–risk prostate cancer. Partial gland ablation proposed good oncological control with fewer adverse effects requiring more additional treatments for selected patients with organ–confined prostate cancer. In addition, potency and continence appear to be better preserved with PGA.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free.
  • 55 lakhs+ doctors trust M3 globally

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Unlimited access to original articles by experts
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Secure: we never sell your data
  • Signing up takes less than 2 mins
Try M3 India / Log In
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!

M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen