• Profile
Close

Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly versus sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Aug 11, 2017

Seino Y, et al. – The physicians conducted this work to evaluate the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with once–weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide versus sitagliptin in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). As per the results, more treatment–emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with semaglutide versus sitagliptin in Japanese subjects with T2D ; nevertheless, the semaglutide safety profile was similar to that of other glucagon–like peptide–1 (GLP–1) receptor agonists. Semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight versus sitagliptin.

Methods
  • Researchers designed phase 3a randomized, open–label, parallel–group, active–controlled, multicentre trial including adult Japanese subjects with T2D treated with diet and exercise only or oral antidiabetic drug monotherapy (washed–out in run–in period) received once–weekly s.c. semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or once–daily oral sitagliptin 100 mg.
  • The preliminary outcomes was number of treatment–emergent adverse events (TEAEs) after 30 weeks.

Results
  • They randomized a sum of 308 subjects and exposed to treatment, with similar baseline characteristics across groups.
  • They noted overall 2.9% of subjects in both the semaglutide 0.5 mg and the sitagliptin group prematurely discontinued treatment, compared with 14.7% in the semaglutide 1.0 mg group.
  • The majority of discontinuations in the semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg groups were due to adverse events.
  • It was showed that more TEAEs were reported in semaglutide– versus sitagliptin–treated subjects (74.8%, 71.6% and 66.0% in the semaglutide 0.5, 1.0 mg and sitagliptin groups, respectively).
  • It was showed that adverse events were mainly mild to moderate.
  • The data demonstrated that gastrointestinal adverse events, most frequently reported with semaglutide, diminished in frequency over time.
  • It was noted that mean HbA1c (baseline 8.1%) decreased by 1.9% and 2.2% with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 0.7% with sitagliptin (estimated treatment difference versus sitagliptin [ETD] –1.13% [95% confidence interval –1.32; –0.94] and –1.44% [–1.63; –1.24], both p<0.0001).
  • The results revealed that body weight (baseline 69.3 kg) was reduced by 2.2 and 3.9 kg with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively (ETD –2.22 kg [–3.02; –1.42] and –3.88 kg [–4.70; –3.07]; both p<0.0001).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay