• Profile

Childhood Obesity: Are Forever Chemicals to Blame?

M3 Global Newsdesk Mar 18, 2023

There is growing evidence that poly-fluoroalkyl substances PFAS have negative health impacts, and a new study highlights their impact on childhood obesity. Recent researches about the health impacts of PFAS are discussed in this article.

Key takeaways

  1. Forever chemicals impact thyroid function and metabolism, putting children at risk for multiple diseases.
  2. Researchers suggest PFAS screening could be added to annual blood work to better detect problems from the source.

Forever chemicals or per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) may increase risks of childhood obesity, and set kids up for health problems later in life.

A new study found that PFAS exposure changes young people’s metabolic processes, impacting how their bodies metabolise lipids and amino acids and altering thyroid hormone functions.

The researchers say their findings shed new light on how PFAS impacts children’s metabolic processes and may imply a need for PFAS screening at annual physical appointments.

The study was conducted by researchers at several schools of medicine and by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The researchers tested blood samples from 449 adolescents who had participated in the studies.

The researchers measured PFAS levels in blood plasma and found that all samples contained mixtures of PFAS, including PFOS, PFHxS, PFHpS, PFOA, and PFNA. Using a high-resolution mass-spectrometry metabolism method to measure about 10,000 metabolites in the samples, the results showed that the chemicals affected multiple biological pathways responsible for diseases, says Lida Chatzi, MD, PhD, study author and professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School.

“The study included two independent cohorts—one cohort of teenagers at risk for developing type 2 diabetes; the other a cohort of young adults,” says Chatzi. “Both cohorts confirmed the original hypothesis—the proof of causality.”

PFAS impact on metabolism

Previous research has noted a connection between PFAS and thyroid health in adults. The study adds to the literature by highlighting how chemicals can harm adolescent thyroid function, too. 

“In kids, this hasn’t been established before,” says Jesse A. Goodrich, PhD, lead author of the study and assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School. “The fact that PFAS are impacting thyroid hormone is really important because thyroid hormone is one of the key determinants of metabolism that is necessary for normal development during puberty.” 

The study found a positive association between PFAS and B-4, the primary thyroid hormone, in adolescents, says Chatzi. It’s important to look further into this connection, as issues with the thyroid can roll over to problems with weight management or put children at risk for other conditions later in life, she adds.

“The effect of PFAS on the thyroid hormones could perhaps explain their associations with multiple other diseases—from obesity to type two diabetes to cancer to liver disease,” says Chatzi.

As such, forever chemicals could be more harmful than even the study shows, and more investigations are needed to define the breadth of PFAS-based health risks.

Research needed on prevention, treatment

Staying safe from PFAS requires a mixture of prevention and intervention neither of which is easy.

On the prevention side, the researchers say children and adults should avoid the chemicals where possible. But unfortunately, PFAS are found in a wide range of products from fire extinguishers to cooking materials, food packaging to rain jackets, cosmetics, to period underwear. Further, most manufacturers are not required to test products for PFAS, so even people actively trying to avoid the chemicals can be blindly exposed.

Classifying PFAS on a group basis

PFAS prevalence makes it more likely that people can be impacted by a group of chemicals than one particular culprit. The researchers argue that the chemicals should be classified as a whole class, rather than name-by-name, to be more effectively phased out by future legislation.

The researchers were nuanced in their approach of looking at the risks of multiple PFAS together, as past studies have more commonly isolated one chemical. 

“The combination of these exposures may actually affect us differently than just a single exposure by itself," says Goodrich. “We should probably start thinking about regulating more as a chemical class as opposed to just a chemical by chemical basis which is currently the approach that's being taken.”

Environmental work groups like the Green Science Policy Institute, which was not affiliated with the study, advocate for phasing out multiple PFAS. The institute educates people on PFAS health risks and advocates for clean alternatives.

“Evidence is growing that the widespread use of forever chemicals is setting our kids up for health problems,” says Rebecca Fuoco, Director of Science Communications at the Green Science Policy Institute. “The kicker is that many uses of these chemicals are unnecessary. We need to phase out all non-essential uses of the whole class of PFAS as soon as possible.”

On the treatment side, the researchers suggest doctors could be able to detect PFAS levels through annual blood work. If such a protocol was made routine, physicians could guide care if and when conditions arise.

“We're moving towards the ability to potentially measure both environmental exposures and these metabolites in blood to be able to give more of a precise risk profile, and understand an individual's risk for different diseases,” says Goodrich. “With that information, you can maybe implement different preventative measures–preventative lifestyle measures.”

Asking people about the products they use and their risk for PFAS exposure could also be added to questioning, as part of standard clinical practice, says Chatzi.

“We ask people: ‘What's your diet? Do you smoke? Where do you live?” says Chatzi. “But we need to incorporate more environmental exposures in the screening for annual physicals.”

What this means for you

 In the future, physicians may be able to take into consideration a person’s level of PFAS exposure at annual physicals by asking questions about products they use and conducting blood tests.


This story is contributed by Claire Wolters and is a part of our Global Content Initiative, where we feature selected stories from our Global network which we believe would be most useful and informative to our doctor members.

Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!

M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen