• Profile
Close

Limited conclusions can be drawn on limiting antithrombotic therapy beyond 1 year for stent patients with AF

Newswise Sep 27, 2018

The first randomized trial of its kind was unable to establish noninferiority of oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone to combined OAC and a single antiplatelet agent (APT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease beyond 1 year after stent implantation.

Findings of the OAC-ALONE study were reported today at the 30th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium. Sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF), TCT is the world’s premier educational meeting specializing in interventional cardiovascular medicine. The study was also published simultaneously in Circulation.

“In patients with concomitant AF and stable coronary artery disease beyond 1 year after coronary stent implantation, the ESC guidelines have consistently recommended OAC without antiplatelet therapy,” said Yukiko Nakano, MD, with the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine in Kyoto, Japan. “In clinical practice, however, antiplatelet therapy is often used on top of OAC beyond 1 year after coronary stenting. Importantly, no randomized controlled trials have evaluated OAC monotherapy in this patient subset.”

From November 2013 to December 2016, a total of 696 patients were enrolled in the study from 111 participating centers. The trial was designed to enroll 2,000 patients for 12 months. However, enrollment was prematurely terminated after enrolling 696 patients in 38 months.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to OAC alone (n=344) or combined OAC and APT (n=346). The mean age was 75.0±7.6 years, and 85.2% were men. OAC was warfarin in 75.2% and direct OACs in 24.8% of patients. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups.

The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or systemic embolism, while the major secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint or major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) classification.

During a median follow-up interval of 2.5 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 54 patients (15.7%) in the OAC-alone group and in 47 patients (13.6%) in the combined OAC and APT group (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.72; P=0.20 for noninferiority; P=0.45 for superiority). The major secondary endpoint occurred in 67 patients (19.5%) in the OAC-alone group and in 67 patients (19.4%) in the combined OAC and APT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71-1.39; P=0.016 for noninferiority; P=0.96 for superiority). MI occurred in 8 (2.3%) and 4 (1.2%) patients, while stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 13 (3.8%) and 19 (5.5%) patients, respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 27 (7.8%) and 36 (10.4%) patients, respectively.

“Because the patient enrollment was prematurely terminated, the study was underpowered and inconclusive,” added Dr. Nakano. “Larger adequately powered randomized trials are required to establish the optimal antithrombotic regimen in this population.”

—Newswise

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay